Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piotr Marciniak (architect)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Piotr Marciniak (architect)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:DGG with the following rationale "might pass WP:PROF or WP:aUTHOR". Sadly, I cannot find any sources to show that this is the case. He is a moderately successful architect, but I don't think he is encyclopedic (he didn't win the Honorary SARP Award yet), for WP:PROF this is not looking promising ([1]), and as for WP:AUTHOR, he has published several books, but I couldn't find any reviews or indication of impact. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:57, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:57, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:18, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No notability evident either as an architectural scholar (citation counts too low for WP:PROF#C1) nor as an architect of works others have written in-depth about. Perhaps there are sources that I didn't find because of the language barrier, but in that case I'd expect Piotrus to have found them. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:43, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.