Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pixable (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:20, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pixable

Pixable (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
this is not more than a web-site (+app). It got some exposure on blogs and the like (that looks like advertisement), but I don't see it reached notability (during it's lifetime, since it's already defunct).
Notice that this page was already deleted in the first AfD, but recreated as advertisement.

Llaanngg (talk) 21:15, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:07, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pixable (2nd nomination), released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.