Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Place-based initiative

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Place-based initiative (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a dictionary entry for a term that "...seems to have entered common parlance"—in other words, it's poorly written and has very little substance. There is not enough content for this to warrant an article in the encyclopedia. giso6150 (talk) 16:02, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The references actually say "place-based approach." What we have are two words, "place-based" and "initiative" (or "approach") that together form a phrase that is not particularly common or unique among phrases. Jacknstock (talk) 18:41, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 21:23, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 21:23, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.