Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PlanetRisk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 13:30, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PlanetRisk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

IP removed PROD. Non-notable company where the sourcing is run of the mill announcements of acquisitions or your standard business journal coverage that doesn't meet the WP:ORG requirements and are either reprints of PR, interviews, or have lax editorial standards. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:57, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:56, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- typical corp spam with language such as "merges big data sourcing and provides risk management, geospatial business intelligence[1] and social network analysis..." Otherwise, WP:CORPDEPTH is not met and no claim of significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:58, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete fails GNG. refs are less than meets the eye Dlohcierekim (talk) 08:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. I removed the corporate spam and puffery from the article - Wikipedia is not a platform for marketing or advocacy. -- HighKing⁺⁺16:05, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Qualifies as a stub post -- HighKing⁺⁺(UTC) edits? WP:CORPDEPTH could now be added. 70.184.241.167 (talk) 18:36, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. Notability requirements are no lesser for a stub than for a larger article.Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:48, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please elaborate as to why you invoked HighKingDlohcierekim (talk) 18:50, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.