Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plasmodium corradettii

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:56, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Plasmodium corradettii

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per this paper, the characterization of this species is not clear and thus should not have an encyclopedia article Icebob99 (talk) 20:01, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:31, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree that a nomen dubium does not rate an article unless otherwise notable, which does not seem to be the case.-- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 06:52, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Obscure nomina dubia don't merit an article (the articles we do have in Category:Nomina dubia are almost all dinosaurs, a group of organisms where the is a great deal of interest and significant effort to resolve dubious names). Plantdrew (talk) 17:52, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.