Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Platinum Point

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. RL0919 (talk) 22:16, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Platinum Point (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article that about a very small area of Edinburgh that fails to meet WP:GNG 1keyhole (talk) 19:35, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:37, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - There is nothing in the article to suggest that this is anything other than a routine property development and it does not have the sort of notability required for an article of its own. Dunarc (talk) 22:45, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: There is perhaps more that could be said around the whole area regeneration (Granton Waterfront regeneration, etc.) but coverage such as this doesn't demonstrate the specific notability of this particular property development. AllyD (talk) 06:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:06, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a routine property development that doesn't meet GNG. LibStar (talk) 06:39, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.