Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plunet BusinessManager

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 01:42, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Plunet BusinessManager

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded this under the following rationale: "the coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. " It was deprodded by creator without any explanation, and subsequent superficial edits do little to address the issue, IMHO. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:11, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:11, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, multiple SPA Boom Boom Hans + Seraphine.gerth, maybe related to (2010) Fraber + Sokrates_sf on Project-Open found from here. –Be..anyone (talk) 03:23, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.