Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Po mone modi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Notability not established. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 03:45, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Po mone modi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Information can be included in Narendra Modi under Criticisms. Not sure if this comes under Criteria for Speedy Deletion. Ahmer Jamil Khan^Who?_Chat? 04:52, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 12:18, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as failing GNG. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete its a twitter hashtag!! it deserves at most a single line in criticisms of Modi ChunnuBhai (talk) 08:19, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's not necessary either given recentism nature of this. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:41, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:43, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:43, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The WP:RECENTISM essay works well here. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:50, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.