Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Points in Time

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Paul Bowles. Nakon 22:44, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Points in Time

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Should be deleted or merged into the author's page. Jerod Lycett (talk) 01:09, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. It should be minimally merged and then redirected, neither of which required it to come to AfD. --Michig (talk) 20:40, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Michig: I tried a prod with a suggestion of merge if not deleted, the prod got removed. So I moved it to here. Most other *fD are for Discussion, so I'm not sure where else to place it. Can you point out where to go, maybe just the talk page? Jerod Lycett (talk) 22:14, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Article talk page for merge proposals. Even if there's nothing to merge it's worth a redirect. --Michig (talk) 06:11, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or Merge and redirect to Paul Bowles. I added two third party independent sources to the article. I think its time saving to source and unsourced article than to waste time on unnecessary discussion at AfD. I have no idea of why the article was nominated for deletion in the first instance. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£}

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:46, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It can just be rewritten on the author's page if needed. Jerod Lycett (talk) 19:52, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:47, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Paul Bowles. Doesn't come near books notability guideline, so no stand-alone article, but valid as a redirect: Noyster (talk), 11:52, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.