Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Political mobilization

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mass mobilization. (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 03:05, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Political mobilization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article seems to be a WP:REDUNDANTFORK of Mass mobilization. It also looks like a dictionary article, so WP:NOTDIC is an issue. Ceosad (talk) 13:41, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:00, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:00, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect seems justified. I forgot about that while nominating. Ceosad (talk) 15:42, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Mass mobilization. That article is okay, at least about a recognized topic. "Political mobilization" seems to be a more general and vague term, so not exactly the same thing. But redirect is probably more useful to readers than simply delete. Borock (talk) 15:48, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Political mobilization, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.