Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pooja Yadav

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 16:30, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pooja Yadav (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails Wikipedia:Notability, no external reliable coverage at all. Signature 13:19, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Signature 13:19, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Signature 13:19, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - nowhere near top rank; not elected official; difficult for me to search on mobile but am getting nothing & media coverage would usually be routine passing mentions. There seems currently to be some sort of off-wiki thing leading to disruption in Yadav-related articles & the article creator may be involved or encouraged/misguided by that. - Sitush (talk) 13:39, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Does this even need an AfD. Notability is not asserted (unless being a police officer is notable). --regentspark (comment) 16:00, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I do not see evidence that this person meets GNG, and I do not see evidence that they meet any supplementary guideline that could supersede GNG. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:25, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete pending evidence of non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:17, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete borders on WP:A7 in terms of notability the creator of this article has also created several other articles on non-notable police officials. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:05, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, doesn't seem to match any of our guidelines. Doug Weller talk 09:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:51, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.