Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poomulli (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:22, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Poomulli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable family. The article is about a family, and should not be confused with Poomulli Mana which is their house. The house has been attracting some attention as a tourist and healthcare destination, but I do not think it still would be enough to qualify our WP:N standards, and there is definitely not enough material on the family anyway. The last AFD ages ago was probably hijacked by members of the family who mass-voted to keep this. This article probably serves to market their health care facilities as the Wikipedia page shows up on search results and a link to the Wikipedia page is also provided on their website - [1] Jupitus Smart 13:30, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Hinduism, India, and Kerala. Jupitus Smart 13:30, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, but a reluctant one. The article as it stands is effectively unsourced since everything fails verification. I have to agree with the nom that, as written, it reads as either WP:PROMO or WP:CRUFT. That said, it does not warrant SALT, as it is entirely possible that an encylopaedic article could be written. It could clear GNG if the dubious content of the article turns out to be correct, and gScholar shows a dozen possible leads to good info. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 20:02, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Draftify - maybe someone can find more non-English sources to improve the article with. - Indefensible (talk) 15:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Draftify or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:36, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:25, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for lack of notability. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 17:43, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.