Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Postcards from memory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Postcards from memory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It simply fails WP:BKCRIT. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 10:50, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 10:51, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SupportThis article and And we remained are created by the same user. This, like it, also has no refs or links whatsoever and probably hasn't been published.Ack! Ack! Pasta bomb! (talk) 11:54, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (shout) @ 14:23, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (parlez) @ 14:23, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per above. This just doesn't have any coverage in reliable sources to show that it passes NBOOK. Blog reviews and Amazon sales don't count towards notability here on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:06, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Does not meet notability guidelines. Bacchiad (talk) 01:30, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.