Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Postmodern vertigo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 06:55, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Postmodern vertigo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The archive external link says: 'Maybe "Panic Encyclopaedia" Arthur and Marilouise Kroker or some of their other works or "Death at the Parasite Cafe" Stephen Pfohl"'; it seems like the mailgroup author is speculating two postmodern books produce vertigo? I cannot verify whether the books cover the term in any meaningful amount. I cannot find any mentions of the term online. The article as it is and in all its versions seems like WP:OR. Darcyisverycute (talk) 06:17, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Darcyisverycute (talk) 06:17, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: reads like OR, if not an outright hoax. Owen× ☎ 23:57, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.