Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powerboot PCs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Powerboot PCs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fail WP:NCORP ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 19:21, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 19:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 19:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Americas-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 19:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Per several source searches, does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH at this time. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 05:08, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An unreferenced WP:SPA article on a company, mainly listing its products. There is no claim of notability, and my searches are finding nothing but mundane listings. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 13:23, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - My source searching for coverage did not find sufficient secondary source coverage and therefore fails WP:ORG --Imminent77 (talk) 19:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.