Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prabhat Maurya (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:SNOW and criterion WP:G5. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 13:31, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prabhat Maurya

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating after declined CSD under another criterion. I don’t see anything other than routine coverage of this youth cricketer - nothing that comes close to meeting GNG or an SNG. Larry Hockett (Talk) 07:40, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Larry Hockett (Talk) 07:40, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Larry Hockett (Talk) 07:40, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:53, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - Seems to fail CSD G4 (but I can't see the previously deleted page to confirm) and certainly G5 (creator has now been blocked as a sock, whose only purpose seems to be to create articles and then rename the subject to Nilesh). Even if the article technically passes these 2, the article is still about a non-notable cricketer who fails GNG / NCRIC.Spike 'em (talk) 08:27, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – does not meet G4, as the new article is about a different subject to the old. Certainly does not meet GNG or SNG. Harrias ^talk 09:47, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure? This version from wayback machine uses many of the same details / references (the same cricinfo and cricbuzz profiles are on both) as the current page, particularly the details about the subject replacing another cricketer who committed age fraud. Spike 'em (talk) 12:59, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:NCRIC and WP:GNG. Tayi Arajakate (talk) 11:07, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all the above, and possibly salt the article title too. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 12:42, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.