Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PragmaDev Studio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) —SerialNumber54129^{paranoia /cheap shit room} 15:32, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PragmaDev Studio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notabilty. No references, and searches reveal nothing reliable and indepedent that speaks to notability. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 07:34, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 09:02, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I see thirteen references in further reading, most of which were discussed in the previous AfD (which I initiated) See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real Time Developer Studio. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:09, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have re-organized the article and added references. Now there are 18 references, mostly scientific publications presented during recognized international conferences where the papers are reviewed by their peers. I hope this demonstrates the notability, if so please consider removing the notices. --Manu31415 (talk) 13:26, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:20, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notable per Walter Görlitz and Manu31415. The coverage available in books and articles satisfies GNG. James500 (talk) 14:10, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:12, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- Passes GNG per sources already in the article. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 18:22, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.