Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pranav Anam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 04:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pranav Anam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Non-notable person. Fails GNG. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 08:52, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete. Non-notable person. We get way too many articles like these. Uncletomwood (talk) 09:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete -- yes, please. Promo article on a non notable subject. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:36, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It clearly passes gng,Detailed News articles from The Hindu , Yahoo , IIFL , Firstpost etc is found Iouytrewq (talk) 09:47, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the sources are simply essentially PR and none of it is actually convincing. SwisterTwister talk 01:38, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yes, there's a smattering of advertorial style coverage -- nowhere near enough to meet WP:GNG. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:33, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Fails WP:GNG. PR Uncletomwood (talk) 14:30, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.