Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prasant Palakkappilly (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 02:11, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prasant Palakkappilly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am making a procedural nomination on behalf of AyaanLamar, who attempted to nominate the article for deletion, but did not follow the correct procedure, so that it was not transcluded. I am expressing no opinion on whether the article should be deleted or not. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:37, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete The Article does not clearly meet the criteria for being a PUBLIC FIGURE . This man is not in fact popular in his own state let alone the country . AyaanLamar (talk) 20:06, 14 February 2018 (UTC) —SOCKSTRIKE. MT Train^Discuss 19:07, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

and also most of the sources are WP:BLPSELFPUB AyaanLamar (talk) 20:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

None of the sources are WP:BLPSELFPUB. Most of them are neutral articles published in reputed newspapers. Apart from being head of several reputed institutions, he is also a popular environmentalist. You may also search in google with the spellings "Prasant Palakkappillil" and Prasant "Palackappillil" to see more results. This page was nominated for deletion on 24 May 2015. The result of the discussion was keep. He is NOTABLE. Achayan (talk) 07:21, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about an unremarkable person WP:A7 and i have googled the name and little to no articles or results are there AyaanLamar (talk) 15:55, 21 February 2018 (UTC) SOCKSTRIKE --Hagennos^Talk 14:14, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - non notable subject, fails WP:GNG. Sources are self published. Excelse (talk) 08:22, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- I can see nothing in this article to make the subject out as notable. I am not sure if he is a headmaster or head of a college, but he clearly does not meet WP:ACADEMIC, the relevant criterion. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:37, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• delete I see passing mentions, but not the significant independent coverage required by WP:GNG. I also don't see evidence that he meets the notability standards for academics.Sandals1 (talk) 16:13, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nothing here establishes notability apart from primary sources --Hagennos^Talk 14:14, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.