Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preetha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, with kudos to Skr15081997 for improving the article. Mojo Hand (talk) 03:34, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Preetha

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find notability-of course its a bit hard when the person is hard to search for when they have no last name listed also. Wgolf (talk) 03:52, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 04:33, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 04:33, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 03:32, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment A glance at the history suggests the full name here is Preetha Raghav. --j⚛e decker ^talk 03:33, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment yes, and searching using this filter there are more sources.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 16:04, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 20:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The subject meets WP:GNG. She has received significant coverage in reliable sources. I have improved and added reliable sources to this biography. It seems like WP:BEFORE was not followed here.--Skr15081997 (talk) 12:52, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep With the addition of new sources by Skr15081997, it meets WP:GNG. I am One of Many (talk) 06:13, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.