Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Presidential Successor Support System

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Procedural Keep. Next time write a more compelling deletion nomination. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:19, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Presidential Successor Support System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is this notable? I can find no articles about it online. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:27, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:27, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Politics. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:39, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Please see https://theweek.com/articles/714780/washingtons-secret-doomsday-plans The whole article is about preparations for presidential succession. This book reference should also be helpful:Graff, Garrett M. (2017). Raven Rock: the story of the U.S. Government's secret plan to save itself-while the rest of us die (hardcover ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-1-4767-3540-5., summarized in"Washington's secret Doomsday plans". theweek. 2017-07-30. Retrieved 2025-04-14.. CNN is a reliable source; the fact that the CNN's journalism on this topic was posted to YouTube does not take away from its notability, even though many other things posted to YouTube are self-published or unreliable for other reasons. As an alternative, this could be merged into another article in Category:Continuity of government in the United States, but I think the topic is important enough to warrant having its own article. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 16:23, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.