Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Presumed security

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:02, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Presumed security (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A term seemingly coined by a single blog post. The post does not appear to have received secondary coverage and Wikipedia now seems to be primary source of the term. Brandon (talk) 08:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Brandon (talk) 08:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• delete nonreliable source; the concept fails WP:GNG in the industry. --Altenmann >talk 20:18, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - a single unreliable source is basically original research, which we have never done. This concept might be true, but until three reliable secondary sources have considered it, we can’t. Bearian (talk) 09:27, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.