Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pretty Litter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:53, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty Litter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and couldn't find independent or any WP:RS that covers article. Zazzysa (talk) 15:47, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:59, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:59, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG and WP:SPIP, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND as they all rely on quotations from company sources, are press releases or company announcements, or rely on company-produced material. -- HighKing⁺⁺15:12, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - interesting invention, but there is no evidence the company that makes it is notable. Bearian (talk) 17:58, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.