Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro-Tech Knives

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pro-Tech Knives (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks Notability — Preceding unsigned comment added by Littledipples (talk • contribs)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 00:45, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 00:45, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm a Weak Keep on this one. I'm seeing some coverage of the company and its knove including in relation to special knives its made and legislation on knife sales but I'd like to see a few more major soirces covering the company in depth. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:36, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • References? HighKing⁺⁺ 12:53, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - the article reads like a promotional brochure and none of the references indicate any notability. WP is not a directory--Rpclod (talk) 14:56, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Promotional article for a run-of-the-mill company. References fail the criteria for establishing notabilty. Fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:53, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.