Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProShare

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:38, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ProShare

ProShare (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Has been tagged as promotional and with notability concerns since 2017. Seven of the eight inline references are the company's website. I have not looked at all of the links tacked on at the end, but of the two I did, both were passing mentions. A contributor to this article, a single purpose account with no WP:COI declaration has also created Draft:Janet Cooper, a highly promotional AfC about the founder of this organisation, which I have declined. Greenman (talk) 22:49, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 15:49, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProShare, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.