Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro Music Rights

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:32, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pro Music Rights

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was a draft article submitted by an editor with a conflict of interest. Since creation the article has largely relied upon press releases as references and once given a cleanup leaves very little else to demonstrate notability. Longhair\^talk 14:03, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm unable to find any sources outside of press releases. If those PRs are accurate, this might be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Argento Surfer (talk) 16:23, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Per WP:TOOSOON, trivial and reads like a promo piece. Kierzek (talk) 18:26, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete According to his LinkedIn listing the CEO and founder of Pro Music Rights is only 19 years old and graduated from high school in 2018 which makes it highly unlikely his company is the third biggest performing rights organization in the USA yet.

PhilipCowan (talk) 18:50, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's actually quite probable that it's the third biggest PRO in the US, seeing as there were really only two in operation before 2018, and it's only the fifth in history. Whether there are enough in-depth sources about a company that's only been in existence for a few months is another matter. Richard3120 (talk) 18:49, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per norm. Just press releases and nothing to make out of notability. PlotHelpful (talk) 19:15, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete too new, fails WP:NORG, sources as mentioned above are PRish or do not significantly cover the subject. JC7V (talk) 02:26, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.