Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProactiveRISK

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus DGG ( talk ) 04:46, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ProactiveRISK

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to lack sources to show notability. About half the references are press releases or similar. Once those are discounted there's not much left - mostly brief pieces talking to the founder about Heartbleed as part of larger articles, but nothing significant on the company. A search online turns up more of the same - a couple of brief mentions, some press releases, but nothing substantive. Bilby (talk) 11:23, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:31, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect to Tom Brennan, this seems to be a promo article with the same references as the founder. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 16:40, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now and only redirect if the founder himself is solidly notable and acceptable but it certainly seems this article is deletion applicable as it is questionable for its notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:10, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.