Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prodapt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:54, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prodapt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant advertisement of the company based on Press Releases. Lack of significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content. GermanKity (talk) 05:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 05:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 05:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 05:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Promotional in the extreme, notable in the other extreme. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:12, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: A buzzword-laden article on a subsidiary, substantially edited by the WP:SPA Prodapt123. Even if the sections setting our their wares (such as Digital impact business outcome) were to be pruned, I am not seeing evidence of attained notability. The various listings and industry awards (Fast-50, Best Employee Recognition Program, etc.) fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH and searches find more routine announcement-based coverage. Fails WP:NCORP, and neither the Jhaver Group parent company nor the Affirma Capital minority stakeholder ([1]) has a page which could serve as a redirect target. AllyD (talk) 07:51, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: providers of "insights and services leveraging next-gen technologies", whatever that means, are not inherently notable. . . Mean as custard (talk) 07:59, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.