- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:31, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
- Product software implementation method (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
In 2010 there was a request on the talk page for someone to cleanup the article but it seems no one is interested enough to add any sources. I would not be surprised if there is another article covering the subject but if so I don’t know what it is Chidgk1 (talk) 18:00, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
- Despite the negative for COPYVIO I am still inclined to vote delete as the article itself is a combination of WP:NOT essay text and WP:OR, all of it uncited, some of it incomprehensible. There may be some stuff worth saving here - nearly impossible to find it though. Caleb Stanford (talk) 20:58, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion due to declined PROD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 18:51, 3 September 2025 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 21:29, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.