Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Profium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 14:38, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Profium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to locate the significant independent coverage required by WP:GNG or WP:NCORP in either English or Finnish. Only reference is 1) non-independent, being authored by the CEO, who also appears to have been a major contributor for the article 2) is a passing mention of two sentences and 3) partially fails verification of what it's cited for. Ljleppan (talk) 17:33, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Finland. Ljleppan (talk) 17:33, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. An attempt to locate Swedish-speaking sources also failed. /Julle (talk) 18:11, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.