Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Profound Aesthetic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:57, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Profound Aesthetic

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this article meets WP:NCORP. While it boasts some high profile RS in the references section, the actual content of those articles is rather threadbare as far as coverage of the subject is concerned. I was able to find some more coverage online, but it seems similarly fleeting: routine announcements of new clothing lines (without any real analysis of said clothing), some name-checking in profiles of models. The only articles I came across with any substantial coverage have independence issues. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:52, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:52, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:52, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:52, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:23, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED. Getting publicity is not the same as notable. Bearian (talk) 13:30, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Rosguill. Trivial coverage not rising to CORPDEPTH. GirthSummit _(blether) 00:03, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.