Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Stealth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:54, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Project Stealth

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article was created in 2009 by an editor who was involved with the game's development (see article talk page), and has been notability-tagged for almost six years. Besides being included in two user-voted top-100 lists on Mod DB (explicitly marked unreliable) and Indie DB (not mentioned in VG/S but has the same parent company), the only sources I could find were all under five paragraphs. QuietCicada - Talk 21:51, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. QuietCicada - Talk 21:51, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It toes the line of notability, IMO, but does not cross it into passing WP:GNG. Not because it was cancelled, but because its development prior to that was not particularly noteworthy. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:28, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Concur with statement already made. DrNegative (talk) 02:56, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ that there is a faint glimmer of notability, but the available sources are really just conveying the content of the Kickstarter. There's not enough here to establish the game is notable, particularly for an unfinished title. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:27, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:30, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.