Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Projectproject (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:51, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Projectproject

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable performing group; requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Local sources only mention group briefly or do not satisfy WP:GNG/WP:RS. First AFD was closed without any editors' weighing in, and the article still does not meet policy. -- Wikipedical (talk) 03:16, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not sure why the last AFD wasn't just treated like an uncontested (re-listed twice) PROD but I would have weighed in had I seen it. Anyway, I can't find anything to suggest the subject meets WP:ORGDEPTH. There's a little bit of coverage but what I could find is all very, very local. Stalwart111 03:31, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

N.b. The previous discussion was closed as no consensus with no prejudice against speedy renomination due to no quorum present. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:59, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:59, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Call me Hahc21 06:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:20, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Can't find any sources to establish non-local notability. -Iago Qnsi 13:01, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.