Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prometheus Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 19:59, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prometheus Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Sending WP:APPNOTE to Finngall and Scientizzle. Boleyn (talk) 12:36, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sources found, no substantial improvement to the article since I tagged it for notability eight years ago. --Finngall ^talk 13:45, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Nothing to suggest good independent notability with my searches finding the best results here. SwisterTwister talk 04:50, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.