Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulse (rock)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete no independent references, not notable. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:45, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pulse (rock)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BAND. Prod contested by author. Bradv 18:14, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 18:14, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:47, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing at all for the applicable notability, nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister talk 04:48, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Only two references and they are home pages of the band and their (supposed) record company. No, we we need multiple references to a reliable secondary sources all talking about this band and that they are actually signed to this record company. Prhartcom (talk) 23:50, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.