Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punctum Books

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar  02:34, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Punctum Books (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A very small, newly established print-on-demand business run by two people, nothing notable whatsoever. Vanasan (talk) 01:57, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - seems to be an awkward attempt to promote a new business using Wikipedia. References 7 - 25 are from clients confirming the company prints their work. That's not evidence of notability whatsoever. The other references are almost entirely not independent of the subject. Stlwart111 02:21, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – as WP:TOOSOON. I think it's an interesting project but aside from some interviews of the editor (Eileen Joy) I wasn't able to find much in-depth coverage. The journals were well produced and I like the open-access idea, but the articles didn't get many cites in GS. The journals are new and it's still early. If anyone else wants to check for cites, here is a list.
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

– Margin1522 (talk) 11:40, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (spiel) @ 20:46, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (confess) @ 20:46, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (articulate) @ 20:46, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punctum Books, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.