- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:09, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- PureMessage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG Clenpr (talk) 08:21, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:12, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: I don't think this is suitable for a redirect/merge to Sophos. REAL_MOUSE_IRL talk 09:33, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Unsourced article, so that doesn't help... I find mostly mentions of institutions using the software , not helpful for notability. Some mentions in conference papers or journals , , but not enough to show notability. Oaktree b (talk) 15:12, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Would prefer a bit more of a robust nomination reason, but regardless, this does in fact fail on WP:GNG. Iljhgtn (talk) 06:15, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.