Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PySynth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:11, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PySynth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was prodded back in 2009, with the rationale "Non-notable Python script." That seems notable to me still. There's a few primary and directory-style links on the internet, and a blog entry, maybe two--but that's it. Drmies (talk) 18:30, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:40, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:26, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:27, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non-notable software, fails WP:NSOFT. MaterialWorks _(talk) 17:04, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per MaterialWorks, NN. —Locke Cole • t • c 22:56, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.