Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QF-Test

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) st170e^talk 12:49, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

QF-Test (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability and advertising issues. Not improved in seven years. —swpb^T 20:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —swpb^T 20:18, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per sources already in the article. We don't delete articles because they're poorly written or because they have not improved over time. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:51, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Notable, referenced and there is no wp:deadline for improving or updating articles DeVerm (talk) 01:50, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as the sources seem enough, this will need familiar attention. SwisterTwister talk 07:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.