Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qtile

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tiling window manager#X-tile-anchor. ST47 (talk) 03:45, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Qtile

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage (WP:BEFORE). Non-notable software per WP:N. SL93 (talk) 22:35, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 22:58, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 22:58, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 22:58, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Tiling window manager#X-tile-anchor to anchor, with history, printworthy ... I'd added a ref on target and its sort of what the deProd ~~talk~~edit summary says. Yet more of my RL spun around by AfD's with crap WP:BEFOREs failing to seek out the alternatives ... Djm-leighpark (talk)
- - Wow, what is your problem? That is a terrible idea anyway to redirect non-notable software to an article that should only list notable ones. SL93 (talk) 12:21, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My problem is I spend too much wasted time at AfDs. Its a straightfordward redirect. And there's way too much flying through for this AfD system. But its a good AfD and notable enough. Do how have an anti-religious viewpoint? Djm-leighpark (talk) 12:25, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree about there being any notability. What the hell does religion have to do with software? SL93 (talk) 12:28, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One answer of hell is likely found trying to run TempleOS in a vm through a Qtile window ... Djm-leighpark (talk) 19:59, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So you dodged the question. SL93 (talk) 20:01, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Tiling_window_manager#List_of_tiling_window_managers_for_X (or a suitable anchor). There are a couple of short reviews out there in print and Youtube, but not enough to rise to the level of notability per WP:GNG. But basic information is verifiable, and reviews and inclusion in multiple Linux distributions show some impact. The topic is a reasonable search term and the articles has had 315 views in the past 30 days. One reasonable alternative to deletion for verifiable material, per our policy WP:ATD, would be to redirect where it is mentioned in context with other tiling window managers. The single referenced sentence in the target would be due weight; QTile doesn't have the impact of say i3 (window manager) or XMonad. But neither does the target list require notability, as far as I can tell--there are third-party Windows and Wayland TWMs without articles. Hence, redirect is my recommendation. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 17:54, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Djm-leighpark and Mark viking. SJK (talk) 20:13, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect,per above Alex-h (talk) 09:49, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.