Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantum 9

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 10:48, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quantum 9 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a non-notable consultant firm that fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Added to Wikipedia on the same day as Michael Mayes (entrepreneur), the founder of the firm. Both would appear to be created by undeclared paid editors. (As a side thought, the company is more likely to receive coverage in the press than a similar-sized consultant on building materials, because cannabis is an altogether more newsworthy topic.) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:52, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 09:04, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 09:04, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I would vote delete, but for the award in the article. I am not sure what to make of it.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:46, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

According to our article on the Stevie Awards, entrants pay a fee of up to $505 and 30 to 40% of them receive awards. The company seems to have been given a bronze Management Award in 2017 in the category "Executive of the Year - Business & Professional Services - Less Than 100 Employees". Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What about the "Best Management Consulting Firm" recognition?-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 11:27, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that a "Best International Marijuana Consulting Firm" award from an online magazine of unknown reliability is enough to show notability. I'm inclined to vote to delete this article, but maybe I'm wrong about that award or someone can show the GNG is met.Sandals1 (talk) 10:47, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete After thinking this through, there is not much to support GNG or any other form of notability.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 01:30, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: does not meet WP:NCOPR. Likely UPE based on behavioural evidence. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:07, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.