Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quidgest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. v/r - T P 02:52, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quidgest

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable organization Küñall (talk) 21:54, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I found lots of substantial coverage in a Google News search. Candleabracadabra (talk) 22:39, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Where? I found no substantial coverage from reliable sources. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 02:33, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Google News. Candleabracadabra (talk) 13:21, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There is a bit of Portuguese-language coverage but I've no idea if these are reliable sources[1][2][3][4][5][6] Very little English-language coverage (English being the international language of computing/IT, I'd expect something if their products were significant): the best I found was[7]. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:19, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:53, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:53, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:53, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:58, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:35, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.