Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quikcycle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 04:13, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quikcycle

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NCORP. Refs are dead links or press releases. Company website does not work. Searching does not find much. May be out of business. Regardless, it does not appear to ever have been notable. MB 00:50, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:15, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:16, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:17, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. @MB: I got |IAbot to rescue some broken links in the article. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:20, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to Gale Technologies where its acquisition is mentioned (also mentioned in this press release). The article is merely describing the former company's proposition and funding and I see no evidence that it ever attained notability in itself. AllyD (talk) 14:31, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.