Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quintin Barry's Top 20 Countdown
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:05, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Quintin Barry's Top 20 Countdown
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Quintin Barry's Top 20 Countdown (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The website does not exist, the page is orphaned and has not been maintained. The original page seems to have been largely an exercise in self-promotion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GrimRob (talk • contribs) 22:57, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: I have applied {{subst:afd2}}, which had not been done by the nominator. No opinion at this time. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:05, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Radio, Internet, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:07, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Written by 94media (talk · contribs) just after the qb20.com WWW site stopped being a fake search engine and started being the WWW site for a radio show. You'll be shocked at the only things the article has ever pointed to in 13 years, which used to include the Twitter and Facebook accounts too. This is advertising. Delete. Uncle G (talk) 08:02, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Utter WP:PROMO for likely an Internet show from someone who is literally a complete unknown; don't know if they were young or old, but the known baseball player Quintin Berry buries their search results. Nate • (chatter) 22:44, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. This is completely unreferenced for the purposes of passing WP:GNG, but claims absolutely nothing about the show that would be "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from GNG. Obvious WP:PROMO attempt. Bearcat (talk) 21:23, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.