Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quranic software
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Digital Quran. Leaving the history in place in case anyone wants to merge something. SoWhy 16:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Quranic software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Software exists for reading and studying the Quran, but per several source searches, the topic does not appear to be notable per Wikipedia's standards. North America1000 00:53, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:55, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:55, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Comment at the very least, it should be merged with Digital Quran. Power~enwiki (talk) 02:17, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Ebook - GretLomborg (talk) 03:35, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Nothing to establish notability. Could be redirected as suggested above. My very best wishes (talk) 17:43, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - both pages (this and digital quran) could be construed as advertisements for their external links, I'd suggest merging and removing external links, but I'm not sure which one is the better destination. Smmurphy(Talk) 19:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Digital Quran as sufficient. SwisterTwister talk 00:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.