Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quscient Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:58, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quscient Technologies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are hardly any reliable sources about this company. The only source I found was about a conflict between 2 employees but nothing much about the company. This is not enough to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:CORPIND. Accordingly, this should be deleted. -- Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:15, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:15, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:15, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- promotional piece on an unremarkable business. No indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:10, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete concur with nom. Insufficient coverage to meet WP:NCORP MB 03:27, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article primarily by a WP:SPA whose account name includes the company name. The article content is largly promoting the virtues of their product, without references. To the extent that references are given, they are poor, primary along with one on a firm which they later took over. Nor are my searches identifying evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 14:35, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.