Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R1Soft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:25, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

R1Soft

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searches have found nothing convincingly better at all including only mentions (including these being press releases quite noticeably so) at News, nothing at all here for convincing notability. SwisterTwister talk 23:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:40, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:40, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NORG. Generally we do not have articles on divisions of other companies unless there is more coverage than can be dealt with in the article on the parent company. In this case the parent company Continuum Managed Services has no article and a brief search shows it unlikely to rate one. Jbh ^Talk 13:30, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, only passing mentions in sources. Tom29739 ^[talk] 19:44, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.