Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R2rick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 18:01, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

R2rick

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't put this as a prod as there are "refs" per say even if unreliable. So I say delete as too soon if ever. Wgolf (talk) 15:31, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

-looks like that R2Rick has been deleted also. Wgolf (talk) 15:32, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no coverage in reliable sources. The cited News Straits Times article does not mention him. No evidence of activity that would lead to adequate coverage. Claims fail for lack of verification in reliables sources. Fails WP:NOTEBLP, fails WP:MUSIC. Looks as though it may be eligible for a speedy delete under A-7 as an Article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject. --Bejnar (talk) 17:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - preferably speedily, as there is no indication of significance. --bonadea contributions talk 12:52, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I note comments on 29 September from the author of the article on both this page's talk page Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/R2rick and the articles talk page Talk:R2rick which are almost identical. I don't see any additional reliable sources or indicia of significance. --Bejnar (talk) 06:35, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not speedy, since there is a credible but extremely weak claim to notability (he apparently performed at an event, which isn't a good claim at all, but it's there). It doesn't change the fact that the subject of the article has not received enough coverage in reliable sources. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.