Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RLMDL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:32, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RLMDL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Article about a musical project with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC, and very little evidence of reliable source coverage to support it -- six of the ten references here are to primary sources like his own website, his own Bandcamp and the record label, while two of the remaining four are to blogs -- and of the two that still survive that disqualifier, one (NOW) is a purely WP:ROUTINE concert listing, and the other (Impose Magazine) just gives them a blurb's worth of coverage in a "potpourri of several topics" sort of article. This is simply not substantive coverage for the purposes of passing WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 17:37, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 23:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 23:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:NMUSIC. SW3 5DL (talk) 02:46, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.