Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Teate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:37, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Teate

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable enough for Wikipedia yet. Claims to have been in Wolfblood, etc., but not listed as a significant character of the show. Is not well-known enough as an actress to be on Wikipedia - seems more like promotion. Sheroddy (talk) 22:57, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The nominator's assertion that she is not notable I agree with. Despite these [1] [2], which are mentions and not really in depth, there really isn't anything accept credits (IMDb, etc.).--TTTommy111 (talk) 17:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as non-notable actress; fails GNG. Quis separabit? 15:27, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as although I would've suggesting redirecting to Wolfblood which has a little over 30 episodes and it seems the show was renewed for another season suggesting more appearances, essentially there's not much and it's probably better to delete for now. SwisterTwister talk 07:29, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG and WP:TOOSOON. Might be notable in the future if she gets more roles--per SwisterTwister, redirect to Wolfblood might be nice for now. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)^{talk to me!}_{see my work} 22:10, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.